It was, but I would say educated guess that I have made based on trends.I got the sense from GA that it was just a guess...
It was, but I would say educated guess that I have made based on trends.I got the sense from GA that it was just a guess...
The correct term would be "placemaking". Which is adding decorative elements that reinforce the theme. And sometimes, as with the pretty tile work along the lazy river, it's simply decorative and doesn't reinforce the theme.
But it is common for lay fans to refer to these placemaking decorative elements as "theming" since they reinforce the theme. It's just easier and most people know what they are talking about.
I'd compare it to the whole footings vs. footers debate. While footing might be the correct term, footer is what a lot of people call them. It's to the point where many people in the industry call them that. As long as everyone knows what you are talking about, I don't see the problem. Only the purists get bent out of shape about it.
Zzzzzzz.....But is there a fundamental difference in what people think of a footer or a footing based on what you call it?
Between "theming" and "placemaking" people end up with incorrect ideas about theme. Theme is not place, period, genre, etc... but because of the way the term theming has weaseled its way into the lexicon people associate "decorative elements which equate XYZ (period, place, genre, etc..)" that theme is as simple as that.
Which is a gross misunderstanding of the artform and reduces it to SoS and the idea that you spackle on "theming" to create a true theme park.
Think of it this way. Theme exists in many forms of expression/communication, but literature is one of the most easily accessible.
Now imagine if someone was writing a book and there was a suggestion they were 'theming it' by adding plotlines and foreshadowing and even verbs and adjectives!
That's patently absurd and misunderstands what it means.
And yet the only reference you have is Wikipedia.
What is your problem man?!!!! I said I don't agree with you. My opinion is no less valid than yours.
But is there a fundamental difference in what people think of a footer or a footing based on what you call it?
Between "theming" and "placemaking" people end up with incorrect ideas about theme. Theme is not place, period, genre, etc... but because of the way the term theming has weaseled its way into the lexicon people associate "decorative elements which equate XYZ (period, place, genre, etc..)" that theme is as simple as that.
Which is a gross misunderstanding of the artform and reduces it to SoS and the idea that you spackle on "theming" to create a true theme park.
Think of it this way. Theme exists in many forms of expression/communication, but literature is one of the most easily accessible.
Now imagine if someone was writing a book and there was a suggestion they were 'theming it' by adding plotlines and foreshadowing and even verbs and adjectives!
That's patently absurd and misunderstands what it means.
Actually, it is.
We're not equals.
Actually, it is.
We're not equals.