Yes. I can live with one 360 screen attraction in each park (Studio & IOA), since it's really the best 3D I've ever experienced. I just hope they improve on the non 360 scenes and experiences since those were what really seem to have made the F&F at Hollywood fairly weak. If F&F gets plussed as much as Reign of Kong did (extra experiences and better 360 definition), it could be OK. Not great, but OK....The future attractions are going to be a different emphasis, as Alexshow says, so the screen debate is really moot...And, none of that seems to have dissuaded the general public. Universals revenue & attendance increases have been through the roof since 2010. The GP often has quite different views than theme park enthusiasts.
About a month ago, out of boredom; me and a family member talked about the Studio Tour. It was her first time on for years, and that she believes that Kong 360 was something she never saw before. And once we got onto Supercharged, while she liked the character interaction; the experience overall was subpar, as it was already used.
As separate attractions? Things can go different, as it may be a personal choice of what comes first. Kong, or Fast and Furious? I found Supercharged at Hollywood to be rather fun, but I am a fan of Fast and Furious and anything is better than freaking gasolina; but I do think it has a lot of weaknesses. Weaknesses that, with this attraction; could be ammended as you will have more time to properly develop your experience with the virtual queues.
Now, do I think it'll be great for Orlando? No, but I do think that there are quite a bit of positives, and that in the end of the day; this is just as much of a comparison to what Spider-Man and Transformers was.