Forgive me, that's how it came across to me. That being said I don't see how saying that the model should be taken lightly or how I am personally not sold on every little aspect means "I wake up with a frown on my face".
I think pointing out positives such as the Battle Escape attraction, Millennium Falcon piece and marketplace (I am waiting until we know more tomorrow to comment on these) should be noted. However, based on this model (which I have said on multiple occasions shouldn't be used to judge the land fully) there are also negatives to be brought up. This addition is fantastic to me and is far better than anything that will ever come to my local theme parks, so I was personally fairly excited about it - however right now, the model, just isn't exciting me as much as even Pandora did.
The fact of the matter is that whilst you can be too negative, you can also be too positive and be blind to some not so good aspects of projects. Pretending that any land is 'perfect' is pointless until you have actually experienced it, so forgive me for being hesitant about the land based on how we have seen previous project go in the last 5 years. It's important to respect everyone's opinion on here, and accept what you might see and phenomenal others might need more convincing about as at the end of the day - its just a model.
