What? That doesn't sound like them at all.
Is this sarcasm lol
What? That doesn't sound like them at all.
Is this sarcasm lol
I've heard it's good, but not great.
From what it sounds like, it's the perfect ride for Toontown in DL, and maybe not the best ride to be the centerpiece attraction of an entire park.
So, I have a question. What is the centerpiece attraction for Magic Kingdom or Animal Kingdom? I get that MMRR is being called that because of its location. However, I would have thought that they consider Galaxy Edge as the centerpiece attraction, even though it isn't in the center of the park. I'm not trying to be a contrarian but trying to determine what this ride was supposed to be for the park.
Something to consider, too, is that a not insignificant number of people are walking in with the attitude of “This better be a worthy replacement for Great Movie Ride” rather than “This is a new ride”, so there’s some nostalgia and bitterness that is being fought from the moment they come through the door.
Granted, Disney put themselves in that situation, but that’s something the ride will have to combat for at least a few years or so when it comes to reviews.
For the record, the two people I know that have ridden it were never all that enamored by GMR.Something to consider, too, is that a not insignificant number of people are walking in with the attitude of “This better be a worthy replacement for Great Movie Ride” rather than “This is a new ride”, so there’s some nostalgia and bitterness that is being fought from the moment they come through the door.
Granted, Disney put themselves in that situation, but that’s something the ride will have to combat for at least a few years or so when it comes to reviews.
Copy and pasted from my friend who's a cast member and his review via text about the ride:
"It was fine, will definitely be a major hit amongst the crowds here. I fear for the long waits then people only getting a 5 min ride when the ride here beforehand was 15 minutes. I certainly wasn't underwhelmed but I was certainly not overwhelmed."
Sounds like it will definitely be a crowd pleaser. Not gonna act like I know this friends taste as he does work at Disney and loves it but doesn't "live and breathe" Disney per say. Id take this as a good review knowing him.
No. The park still won't have enough to do.does anyone think this ride Will help with crowd flow because these past few weeks....
No. The park still won't have enough to do.
Copy and pasted from my friend who's a cast member and his review via text about the ride:
"It was fine, will definitely be a major hit amongst the crowds here. I fear for the long waits then people only getting a 5 min ride when the ride here beforehand was 15 minutes. I certainly wasn't underwhelmed but I was certainly not overwhelmed."
The park will have a lot of great rides, but it's also busier than it's ever been, mostly because of the boarding group situation. That leaves a bunch of sitting ducks running up stand by lines at the remaining attractions. The park definitely needs a lot of development still, but so does DAK.No. The park still won't have enough to do.
Yes animal kingdom desperately needs more attractionsThe park will have a lot of great rides, but it's also busier than it's ever been, mostly because of the boarding group situation. That leaves a bunch of sitting ducks running up stand by lines at the remaining attractions. The park definitely needs a lot of development still, but so does DAK.
*sigh*
These parks were so under-built or in DHS' case, under-built alongside a working studio that ended up closing fairly quickly, further hurting the park. Then the fact that both parks went full decades without any new rides is just unacceptable.
These parks were so under-built or in DHS' case, under-built alongside a working studio that ended up closing fairly quickly, further hurting the park. Then the fact that both parks went full decades without any new rides is just unacceptable.
The park will have a lot of great rides,
These parks were so under-built or in DHS' case, under-built alongside a working studio that ended up closing fairly quickly, further hurting the park. Then the fact that both parks went full decades without any new rides is just unacceptable.
Just after I made this post, I saw this:
Don't Visit Disney's Hollywood Studios Right Now
We discuss what a day at Disney's Hollywood Studios looks like right now, crowd levels and trends, and why we think you shouldn't visit right nowblogmickey.com
Epcot definitely is, but it has more rides was my thinking and is a much bigger park. Epcot also has lots of little B-ticket type things like the circlevision shows or American Adventure, which i'd say based on scale and sets alone puts it at at least a high end C, if not a D.It's easily the second best lineup in WDW. Hell it *might* be a better lineup than USF quality-wise. But USF still spreads its crowds around better.
I'd argue even EPCOT is underbuilt when it comes to things people actively get excited about. The three secondary WDW parks all need 3-4 *additional* rides at the very least. Not replacements, EXPANSIONS.
If an Imagination redo means reviving anything close to the original ride, I wouldn't complain. But yes, adding rides into WS would do the park good. Rat is a welcomed addition.Epcot definitely is, but it has more rides was my thinking and is a much bigger park. Epcot also has lots of little B-ticket type things like the circlevision shows or American Adventure, which i'd say based on scale and sets alone puts it at at least a high end C, if not a D.
Rumors kicking of them talking about a Seas and Imagination redo, but that still just keeps us even in attraction count. I wish they would use the expansion plot between The Land and Seas for something. Or any of the many plots in World Showcase.