Protective screen that will be dropped over the Prez. To protect objects being thrown at them and at least temp. A guard located in the corner to quell any unruly peopleWhat are these current rumors?
Yes we have come to this
Protective screen that will be dropped over the Prez. To protect objects being thrown at them and at least temp. A guard located in the corner to quell any unruly peopleWhat are these current rumors?
I will be one of the boo-ers as long as that doesn't justify a ban..
Personally I hope someone who hates Disney and hates trump does something to his AA.. I would never wish harm on an actual human being but an AA? go for it.
..and I'm done with politics before I get in trouble
Therefore Disney has to take full responsibility of any incident. You can't place a doggy treat on a dog's nose and then punish him for eating it. So banning people for this, sounds to me like a cake lawsuit.
Looked to see if this person is reliable, but from what it seems; he has posted little tidbits in the past about things in particular that I am just going to plop it here (as the HOP thread closed).
From Repentant Orc, HoP is getting reconfigured from scratch, and a Heavy IP will take it over.
Toughen up buttercups.
Protective screen that will be dropped over the Prez. To protect objects being thrown at them and at least temp. A guard located in the corner to quell any unruly people
Without specifics, source on this? Or am I missing sarcasm? (As often happens online.)
Do you also root for the people who scratch their names in the walls of queue buildings? Destruction of property is destruction of property.
Nope, hate that. Including gum on on thunder mountain. It's just this one, very specific instance that would be very extremely gratifying. Not the actual destruction of property, but the rant the senile Twitler in Chief would give post mortem.
And it would cost Disney money which ultimately gets passed on to everyone and probably shuts down the attraction for a while which leads to longer lines elsewhere. If you get enough pleasure out of twitter rants to justify that, I don't know what else to say.
The lawyer who takes the case of a person banned from Disney property for defacing park property is only doing it for publicity. Theres no court where they win that case.
I will be one of the boo-ers as long as that doesn't justify a ban..
Without specifics, source on this? Or am I missing sarcasm? (As often happens online.)
More rumors HoP opening this month:
More rumors HoP opening this month: