Six Flags and Cedar Fair to Merge | Page 4 | Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
  • Home
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Account Upgrades
  • News
    Universal Studios Hollywood Universal Orlando Universal Studios Japan Universal Studios Singapore Universal Studios Beijing
  • Merchandise
Log in Register
What's new Search

Search

By:
  • New posts
  • Search forums
  • Account Upgrades
Menu
Log in

Register

Install the app
  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
  • Forums
  • Other Theme Parks
  • Other U.S. Theme Parks
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Six Flags and Cedar Fair to Merge

  • Thread starter Thread starter GAcoaster
  • Start date Start date Nov 2, 2023
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4

Go to page

Mad Dog

Mad Dog

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
23,950
Location
Pittsburgh area
  • Yesterday at 8:01 PM
  • #61
One major problem with Six Flags is that most of their parks, except for Knotts, sold out to the coaster craze and became primarily 'coaster parks'. Well, that worked for a while. But now the demographics have changed, and the Six Flags/Cedar Fair prime customers, teenagers and twenty somethings, are a declining demographic since family sizes started shrinking two decades ago, and have accelerated the shrink even more so now.
I remember when parks like Cedar Point, Paramount Kings in Cinn. before Cedar Fair, and even the competition's Sea World BGW were more balanced parks with lots of entertainment and non coaster attractions that would attract a larger, and older, demographic in addition to the youth..
Balance in parks is a plus. But the coaster parks got rid of the non coaster and entertainment attractions and became one dimensional. Now they pay
the piper. Their prime demographic doesn't have spending assets or spending power. The parks can only squeeze so much out of their bare wallets.
Heck, SF financial situation is so poor that they even have difficulty building unthemed new coasters, let alone a real theme park (Disney/Universal)
ride. Herschend has done better. Their parks remain balanced and I'm guessing that they might end up acquiring a couple of the best Six Flags parks.
They already bought Kennywood, though not really a regional park, but has always maintained a balanced attraction line up. A good buy there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jerroddragon, UniversalRBLX and kristenabelle
kristenabelle

kristenabelle

Shark Bait
Joined
Apr 12, 2018
Messages
311
  • Yesterday at 8:26 PM
  • #62
Mad Dog said:
One major problem with Six Flags is that most of their parks, except for Knotts, sold out to the coaster craze and became primarily 'coaster parks'. Well, that worked for a while. But now the demographics have changed, and the Six Flags/Cedar Fair prime customers, teenagers and twenty somethings, are a declining demographic since family sizes started shrinking two decades ago, and have accelerated the shrink even more so now.
I remember when parks like Cedar Point, Paramount Kings in Cinn. before Cedar Fair, and even the competition's Sea World BGW were more balanced parks with lots of entertainment and non coaster attractions that would attract a larger, and older, demographic in addition to the youth..
Balance in parks is a plus. But the coaster parks got rid of the non coaster and entertainment attractions and became one dimensional. Now they pay
the piper. Their prime demographic doesn't have spending assets or spending power. The parks can only squeeze so much out of their bare wallets.
Heck, SF financial situation is so poor that they even have difficulty building unthemed new coasters, let alone a real theme park (Disney/Universal)
ride. Herschend has done better. Their parks remain balanced and I'm guessing that they might end up acquiring a couple of the best Six Flags parks.
They already bought Kennywood, though not really a regional park, but has always maintained a balanced attraction line up. A good buy there.
Click to expand...
I don't live far from SFGA, and haven't been there in almost a decade. I love Nitro too, but I can't do a full day of coasters anymore
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mad Dog
SkiBum

SkiBum

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Dec 14, 2012
Messages
2,229
Location
Cincinnati, OH
  • Today at 8:57 AM
  • #63
Mad Dog said:
One major problem with Six Flags is that most of their parks, except for Knotts, sold out to the coaster craze and became primarily 'coaster parks'. Well, that worked for a while. But now the demographics have changed, and the Six Flags/Cedar Fair prime customers, teenagers and twenty somethings, are a declining demographic since family sizes started shrinking two decades ago, and have accelerated the shrink even more so now.
I remember when parks like Cedar Point, Paramount Kings in Cinn. before Cedar Fair, and even the competition's Sea World BGW were more balanced parks with lots of entertainment and non coaster attractions that would attract a larger, and older, demographic in addition to the youth..
Balance in parks is a plus. But the coaster parks got rid of the non coaster and entertainment attractions and became one dimensional. Now they pay
the piper. Their prime demographic doesn't have spending assets or spending power. The parks can only squeeze so much out of their bare wallets.
Heck, SF financial situation is so poor that they even have difficulty building unthemed new coasters, let alone a real theme park (Disney/Universal)
ride. Herschend has done better. Their parks remain balanced and I'm guessing that they might end up acquiring a couple of the best Six Flags parks.
They already bought Kennywood, though not really a regional park, but has always maintained a balanced attraction line up. A good buy there.
Click to expand...

Kings Island has added some more balance but I do agree about the majority of parks. Cedar Point is a coaster park, although I would submit that it never had any qualms about being so. The Point is also consistently busy. This just feels like an overstretched company who cannot maintain, either due to capital or due to management style, the parks. Maybe Cedar Fair was in bad financial shape but this was a poor merger, particularly for the park goers. Herschend has a few larger parks but most of the parks are manageable.

SF will probably promote a former SF manager to CEO and the parks will suffer. From the moment this deal was announced, I figured that Kings Island would start to get back into the same shape it was prior to Cedar Fair when Paramount was letting everything fall apart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mad Dog
AvoidTIMtation

AvoidTIMtation

Shark Bait
Joined
Apr 24, 2013
Messages
237
Location
San Antonio
  • Today at 9:28 AM
  • #64
We'd be here all day talking about the horrible decisions Six Flags has made over the years. My least favorite era being the one where they said they'd add a new attraction to every park every year, which forced them into a corner with random carnival ride additions. But I honestly think their recent investments and additions (at least at their bigger and better performing parks) have been pretty good. While places like Darien Lake and St Louis will definitely be closed or sold off sooner than later, the major parks will be fine. Six Flags and Cedar Fair will always be regional amusement parks so I'll never expect anything other than that. However I still continue to *hate* the fact that they'll be holding the DC License hostage for the next several decades though.
 
Last edited: 51 minutes ago
  • Like
Reactions: Mad Dog
UniversalRBLX

UniversalRBLX

Time Traveler
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
7,737
Location
Cabana Bae
  • 33 minutes ago
  • #65
I think the parks need to go back and improve on the existing experience versus adding new marketable attractions.

Theme parks used to be nice areas to just be in, roam around and enjoy entertainment and dining. Now entertainment is rare and dining options are absolutely disgusting in quality and price. Made it to Cedar Point a few weeks ago, and the busiest area of the park on my visit was the nicest/more pleasurable area to be in (Frontier Town) that also offered the best food quality in the park, go figure.

If the parks gave a similar level of attention to place-making (doesn't mean Disney/Universal-esque theming, just creating a nice environment), they wouldn't be struggling as much.

Knott's is a perfect blend of nicely themed areas with traditional amusement rides.

This might be a controversial point, but some of the larger parks would probably benefit more from replacing or improving existing experiences versus simply adding more.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Jerroddragon, kristenabelle, AvoidTIMtation and 1 other person
Mad Dog

Mad Dog

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
23,950
Location
Pittsburgh area
  • 27 minutes ago
  • #66
SkiBum said:
Kings Island has added some more balance but I do agree about the majority of parks. Cedar Point is a coaster park, although I would submit that it never had any qualms about being so. The Point is also consistently busy. This just feels like an overstretched company who cannot maintain, either due to capital or due to management style, the parks. Maybe Cedar Fair was in bad financial shape but this was a poor merger, particularly for the park goers. Herschend has a few larger parks but most of the parks are manageable.

SF will probably promote a former SF manager to CEO and the parks will suffer. From the moment this deal was announced, I figured that Kings Island would start to get back into the same shape it was prior to Cedar Fair when Paramount was letting everything fall apart.
Click to expand...
I think Cedar Point, even though they went too full cycle on coasters and tore down, or decreased, all the other fun stuff that used to
be Cedar Point, will survive and end up being bought by someone substantial. Cedar Point is not just a park, but it's a full vacation destination.
But it would be better served if it got back in balance. I loved Cedar Point when I went in the 1970's, 1980's, early 90's....but hated it when @UK-Trigg and
I visited a few years ago. CP was on his bucket list for a US visit, and he was greatly disappointed, even though he's a coaster fanatic. But he
wanted more than just coasters on hot sun baked concrete.
and to @UniversalRBLX point. Yes Frontier Land is the best section of the park....but it was even much better when it was almost Diagon like in the past. It was fully woods enclosed and isolated, and you didn't have all the visual interruptions like now. It also had enough demonstration and
live entertainment that you could spend hours upon hours there. And there was a Jungle Cruise type ride near it through the swampy forested area
that's now just a mass of hot concrete and a coaster or two.
 
Last edited: 19 minutes ago
  • Like
Reactions: AvoidTIMtation
AvoidTIMtation

AvoidTIMtation

Shark Bait
Joined
Apr 24, 2013
Messages
237
Location
San Antonio
  • 10 minutes ago
  • #67
UniversalRBLX said:
I think the parks need to go back and improve on the existing experience versus adding new marketable attractions.

Theme parks used to be nice areas to just be in, roam around and enjoy entertainment and dining. Now entertainment is rare and dining options are absolutely disgusting in quality and price. Made it to Cedar Point a few weeks ago, and the busiest area of the park on my visit was the nicest/more pleasurable area to be in (Frontier Town) that also offered the best food quality in the park, go figure.

If the parks gave a similar level of attention to place-making (doesn't mean Disney/Universal-esque theming, just creating a nice environment), they wouldn't be struggling as much.

Knott's is a perfect blend of nicely themed areas with traditional amusement rides.

This might be a controversial point, but some of the larger parks would probably benefit more from replacing or improving existing experiences versus simply adding more.
Click to expand...
But I think that's the difference between major theme parks and regional ones. The exact same people are going to these parks over and over, multiple times a year, some even more than that. So I think the need to add attractions more often than not makes sense.

Disney/Universal can go several years without adding anything because the majority of guests go several years between each visit.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4

Go to page

You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

  • AvoidTIMtation
    Fast & Furious: Supercharged - General Discussion
    • Latest: AvoidTIMtation
    • 3 minutes ago
    Universal Studios Florida
  • Jerroddragon
    Six Flags Magic Mountain
    • Latest: Jerroddragon
    • 7 minutes ago
    Other California Parks
  • Mad Dog
    Universal's Epic Universe General News & Discussion
    • Latest: Mad Dog
    • 9 minutes ago
    Universal Epic Universe
  • AvoidTIMtation
    Six Flags and Cedar Fair to Merge
    • Latest: AvoidTIMtation
    • 10 minutes ago
    Other U.S. Theme Parks
  • MrRoamer
    The Boring Company Tunnel @ UOR (Rumor)
    • Latest: MrRoamer
    • 13 minutes ago
    Miscellaneous Universal

Share this page

Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • Forums
  • Other Theme Parks
  • Other U.S. Theme Parks
  • Style variation
    System Light Dark
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2025 XenForo Ltd.
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…
Back
Top