A gentle reminder that it's in the family's attorney's best interest to show that Universal was negligent, even if they weren't. This isn't me trying to say Universal is blameless - I don't have all of the information - though what's been released officially so far indicates the ride ran as intended.
The attorney can say the pre-existing condition had nothing to do with what happened, but I'm not sure if we have enough information at this point to say that with any real confidence. Someone can have an underlying medical condition, think they're okay because they've done other similar experiences before, but then a confluence of factors leads to an unexpected - and in this case, deeply tragic - outcome.
His claim that part of the seat covering was loose needs a citation - or otherwise it outright contradicts what Universal and state regulators are saying, which is that the ride operated as intended.
Witnesses, as we've already discussed, are notoriously unreliable, especially in traumatic situations. Again, I want to stress that it's possible something went wrong and someone saw it - but we shouldn't take the attorney, or the witness, at their word. That information needs to be verified, and again, it appears to contradict what Universal and the state are saying.
As for the video Universal allegedly did not share... when this proceeds to discovery, they'll have to share it, so I'm not sure what the attorney is getting at other than trying to cast Universal in a negative light.
Really a terrible situation all around.